<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 732 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763152</link>
    <description>In a job-work arrangement where the principal manufacturer supplies inputs and clears the final product on duty, the cost of those principal-supplied inputs is not includible in the assessable value of the intermediate goods manufactured by the job worker. Applying earlier Supreme Court principles, the valuation of the job-worked goods had to be confined to the value attributable to the job worker&#039;s manufacture, so the demand against the job worker could not be sustained. The extended limitation plea was not separately decided because the valuation issue itself was resolved in favour of the appellant, and the assessment demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782691" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 732 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763152</link>
      <description>In a job-work arrangement where the principal manufacturer supplies inputs and clears the final product on duty, the cost of those principal-supplied inputs is not includible in the assessable value of the intermediate goods manufactured by the job worker. Applying earlier Supreme Court principles, the valuation of the job-worked goods had to be confined to the value attributable to the job worker&#039;s manufacture, so the demand against the job worker could not be sustained. The extended limitation plea was not separately decided because the valuation issue itself was resolved in favour of the appellant, and the assessment demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>