<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 748 - ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, PANVEL RAIGAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763168</link>
    <description>The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel Raigad rejected the anticipatory bail application in a customs matter involving mis-declaration of imported goods valued at Rs. 4,11,46,352/-. The applicant was allegedly connected to the import and had nexus with past consignments. Despite being issued seven summons, the applicant failed to appear before customs authorities citing sickness and business tours, and suppressed relevant documents including invoices between firms. The court held that custodial interrogation was necessary given the applicant&#039;s conduct and alleged connection to the intercepted goods, making anticipatory bail inappropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 748 - ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, PANVEL RAIGAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763168</link>
      <description>The Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel Raigad rejected the anticipatory bail application in a customs matter involving mis-declaration of imported goods valued at Rs. 4,11,46,352/-. The applicant was allegedly connected to the import and had nexus with past consignments. Despite being issued seven summons, the applicant failed to appear before customs authorities citing sickness and business tours, and suppressed relevant documents including invoices between firms. The court held that custodial interrogation was necessary given the applicant&#039;s conduct and alleged connection to the intercepted goods, making anticipatory bail inappropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>