<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 753 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763173</link>
    <description>The Kerala HC dismissed an appeal challenging revocation of a customs broker&#039;s license. The appellant argued that revocation proceedings initiated beyond ninety days from the preliminary enquiry report violated regulatory timelines. The HC held that powers to suspend and revoke licenses under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018 are distinct. The preliminary enquiry conducted before license suspension on 25.3.2022 was separate from revocation proceedings initiated after the offence report dated 1.9.2022. The court found the appellant was a habitual offender with multiple violations of verification obligations under Regulation 10. Despite procedural concerns about the Tribunal&#039;s order, the HC found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782670" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 753 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763173</link>
      <description>The Kerala HC dismissed an appeal challenging revocation of a customs broker&#039;s license. The appellant argued that revocation proceedings initiated beyond ninety days from the preliminary enquiry report violated regulatory timelines. The HC held that powers to suspend and revoke licenses under Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations 2018 are distinct. The preliminary enquiry conducted before license suspension on 25.3.2022 was separate from revocation proceedings initiated after the offence report dated 1.9.2022. The court found the appellant was a habitual offender with multiple violations of verification obligations under Regulation 10. Despite procedural concerns about the Tribunal&#039;s order, the HC found no substantial question of law and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>