https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763176 The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal challenging CESTAT's order regarding revocation of customs broker license and forfeiture of security deposit. The case involved customs brokers who processed export papers for entities holding valid GSTIN and IEC certificates issued by competent authorities. The HC held that Regulation 10(a) of CBLR 2018 does not require customs brokers to physically verify exporter/importer addresses or personally meet proprietors. Following precedent from M/s Bright Clearing, the court ruled that customs brokers' responsibility ends with fulfilling regulatory obligations under CBLR 2018. The appeal was dismissed as it raised factual issues rather than substantial questions of law warranting HC intervention. en-us Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2024 18:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763176 The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal challenging CESTAT's order regarding revocation of customs broker license and forfeiture of security deposit. The case involved customs brokers who processed export papers for entities holding valid GSTIN and IEC certificates issued by competent authorities. The HC held that Regulation 10(a) of CBLR 2018 does not require customs brokers to physically verify exporter/importer addresses or personally meet proprietors. Following precedent from M/s Bright Clearing, the court ruled that customs brokers' responsibility ends with fulfilling regulatory obligations under CBLR 2018. The appeal was dismissed as it raised factual issues rather than substantial questions of law warranting HC intervention. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763176