<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 770 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763190</link>
    <description>Rectification under section 154 cannot be used to make a fresh factual determination where the issue was already examined in a completed section 143(3) assessment. On the facts, the proposed addition of a sum treated by the Revenue as commission income required reappraisal of the material and was not a mistake apparent from the record. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the amount was an advance on which tax had been deducted at source further supported deletion of the addition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 770 - ITAT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763190</link>
      <description>Rectification under section 154 cannot be used to make a fresh factual determination where the issue was already examined in a completed section 143(3) assessment. On the facts, the proposed addition of a sum treated by the Revenue as commission income required reappraisal of the material and was not a mistake apparent from the record. The assessee&#039;s explanation that the amount was an advance on which tax had been deducted at source further supported deletion of the addition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>