<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 771 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763191</link>
    <description>The HC set aside the impugned order and demand notice under the I.T. Act, remitting the matter back to the DRP for reconsideration. The court acknowledged technical glitches that hindered e-filing of Form No. 35-A, allowing the petitioner to submit additional pleadings. The DRP must provide a reasonable opportunity and pass orders per legal standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 771 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763191</link>
      <description>The HC set aside the impugned order and demand notice under the I.T. Act, remitting the matter back to the DRP for reconsideration. The court acknowledged technical glitches that hindered e-filing of Form No. 35-A, allowing the petitioner to submit additional pleadings. The DRP must provide a reasonable opportunity and pass orders per legal standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>