<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 777 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763197</link>
    <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order and allowing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The HC found that the Tribunal had reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision without adequate reasoning, emphasizing that interest could not be assessed on an accrual basis for the block period in question. All pending miscellaneous applications were closed, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 777 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763197</link>
      <description>The HC ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the ITAT&#039;s order and allowing the appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The HC found that the Tribunal had reversed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision without adequate reasoning, emphasizing that interest could not be assessed on an accrual basis for the block period in question. All pending miscellaneous applications were closed, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>