<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 780 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763200</link>
    <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order for 2016-2017, finding no violation of natural justice principles under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court concluded that the petitioner was adequately notified and given sufficient opportunities to respond. The petitioner retains the right to pursue statutory remedies, with the limitation period for appeal excluding the time spent on the writ petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:58:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782643" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 780 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763200</link>
      <description>The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order for 2016-2017, finding no violation of natural justice principles under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The court concluded that the petitioner was adequately notified and given sufficient opportunities to respond. The petitioner retains the right to pursue statutory remedies, with the limitation period for appeal excluding the time spent on the writ petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>