<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 2006 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459451</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that direct marketing and sales-related expenses including rebates and discounts cannot be included in Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion (AMP) expenses for transfer pricing purposes, following Sony Ericsson precedent. After excluding Rs.22.64 crores of rebate/discount from AMP expenses, the arm&#039;s length price was determined at Rs.26.31 crores with 9% markup. Since the grant received from associated enterprise (Rs.27.23 crores) exceeded the arm&#039;s length price, no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. The addition of Rs.11.46 crores made by Assessing Officer was deleted. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed partially.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 2006 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459451</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that direct marketing and sales-related expenses including rebates and discounts cannot be included in Advertisement, Marketing and Promotion (AMP) expenses for transfer pricing purposes, following Sony Ericsson precedent. After excluding Rs.22.64 crores of rebate/discount from AMP expenses, the arm&#039;s length price was determined at Rs.26.31 crores with 9% markup. Since the grant received from associated enterprise (Rs.27.23 crores) exceeded the arm&#039;s length price, no transfer pricing adjustment was warranted. The addition of Rs.11.46 crores made by Assessing Officer was deleted. Assessee&#039;s appeal allowed partially.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459451</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>