<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (10) TMI 1396 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459453</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenses cannot be made without first establishing the existence of an international transaction. The TPO applied a Bright line test comparing the assessee&#039;s AMP/sales ratio of 57.44% against four comparables averaging 0.83%, but failed to demonstrate that higher AMP expenditure constituted an international transaction. Following the coordinate bench&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2011-12, the tribunal ruled that ALP determination is premature without proving an international transaction exists. All grounds relating to transfer pricing adjustment were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (10) TMI 1396 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459453</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that transfer pricing adjustments on AMP expenses cannot be made without first establishing the existence of an international transaction. The TPO applied a Bright line test comparing the assessee&#039;s AMP/sales ratio of 57.44% against four comparables averaging 0.83%, but failed to demonstrate that higher AMP expenditure constituted an international transaction. Following the coordinate bench&#039;s decision in the assessee&#039;s own case for AY 2011-12, the tribunal ruled that ALP determination is premature without proving an international transaction exists. All grounds relating to transfer pricing adjustment were allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>