<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that AMP expenses do not constitute an international transaction and rejected the TPO&#039;s application of the Bright Line Test (BLT), aligning with prior decisions. No substantial question of law was identified, but the appellant may reopen the appeal if pending Supreme Court appeals succeed. The appeal was closed, with parties instructed to proceed based on the digitally signed order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 19:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1567 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that AMP expenses do not constitute an international transaction and rejected the TPO&#039;s application of the Bright Line Test (BLT), aligning with prior decisions. No substantial question of law was identified, but the appellant may reopen the appeal if pending Supreme Court appeals succeed. The appeal was closed, with parties instructed to proceed based on the digitally signed order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>