https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83937 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the appellants did not render intermediary services for their foreign principal. The services provided by the appellants were classified as export of services, making them eligible for refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. However, the matter was remanded to the original authority to calculate the eligible refund amount based on actual foreign remittances received during the respective quarters, as the appellants failed to submit certain Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRCs). The appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:23:05 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:23:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83937 The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that the appellants did not render intermediary services for their foreign principal. The services provided by the appellants were classified as export of services, making them eligible for refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. However, the matter was remanded to the original authority to calculate the eligible refund amount based on actual foreign remittances received during the respective quarters, as the appellants failed to submit certain Foreign Inward Remittance Certificates (FIRCs). The appeals were disposed of accordingly. Highlights Service Tax Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:23:05 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83937