<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763127</link>
    <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271AAA for non-maintenance of transfer pricing documents. The assessee had transactions only with a domestic associated enterprise, not international transactions as incorrectly assumed by authorities. The TPO made no transfer pricing adjustments. The CIT(A) correctly noted the absence of international transactions, as the assessee purchased from a domestic company, not a foreign enterprise as alleged. Section 40(A)(2)(b) provisions were omitted by Finance Act 2017, making specified domestic transaction provisions inapplicable. The AO failed to establish grounds for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 707 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763127</link>
      <description>The ITAT Ahmedabad dismissed the department&#039;s appeal regarding penalty under section 271AAA for non-maintenance of transfer pricing documents. The assessee had transactions only with a domestic associated enterprise, not international transactions as incorrectly assumed by authorities. The TPO made no transfer pricing adjustments. The CIT(A) correctly noted the absence of international transactions, as the assessee purchased from a domestic company, not a foreign enterprise as alleged. Section 40(A)(2)(b) provisions were omitted by Finance Act 2017, making specified domestic transaction provisions inapplicable. The AO failed to establish grounds for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>