<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763139</link>
    <description>A GST demand order issued in Form GST DRC-07 was challenged for allegedly lacking reasons and for not addressing the explanation that imported goods were bought in public auction after IGST and cess had already been paid, creating a risk of double taxation. The petition also sought interim protection pending examination of the demand. No final adjudication was made on the validity of the order, but the court directed notice and restrained coercive action until further hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2024 07:23:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 719 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763139</link>
      <description>A GST demand order issued in Form GST DRC-07 was challenged for allegedly lacking reasons and for not addressing the explanation that imported goods were bought in public auction after IGST and cess had already been paid, creating a risk of double taxation. The petition also sought interim protection pending examination of the demand. No final adjudication was made on the validity of the order, but the court directed notice and restrained coercive action until further hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>