https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763144 The Bombay HC declined to entertain a petition challenging an Order-in-Original by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Pune. The court held that petitioners must exhaust alternative statutory appeals before approaching the HC, following precedent in Oberoi Constructions Ltd. The requirement of pre-deposit was not grounds for bypassing statutory remedies, particularly for a multinational company. The court granted liberty to challenge the notification dated 31 March 2023 if statutory remedies fail. Petition disposed of without entertainment. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Jul 2025 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763144 The Bombay HC declined to entertain a petition challenging an Order-in-Original by the Principal Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise, Pune. The court held that petitioners must exhaust alternative statutory appeals before approaching the HC, following precedent in Oberoi Constructions Ltd. The requirement of pre-deposit was not grounds for bypassing statutory remedies, particularly for a multinational company. The court granted liberty to challenge the notification dated 31 March 2023 if statutory remedies fail. Petition disposed of without entertainment. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763144