<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 726 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763146</link>
    <description>The HC set aside assessment orders for six assessment years involving excess Input Tax Credit claims and tax shortfall allegations. The petitioner challenged orders passed without proper show cause notice, claiming violation of natural justice principles due to proprietor&#039;s health issues and portal access problems. The court directed petitioner to deposit a specified amount within three weeks, treat the assessment order as show cause notice, and submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. The respondent must conduct a hearing before passing fresh orders. Non-compliance with deposit or objection timelines would revive the original assessment orders. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2025 15:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 726 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763146</link>
      <description>The HC set aside assessment orders for six assessment years involving excess Input Tax Credit claims and tax shortfall allegations. The petitioner challenged orders passed without proper show cause notice, claiming violation of natural justice principles due to proprietor&#039;s health issues and portal access problems. The court directed petitioner to deposit a specified amount within three weeks, treat the assessment order as show cause notice, and submit objections with supporting documents within four weeks. The respondent must conduct a hearing before passing fresh orders. Non-compliance with deposit or objection timelines would revive the original assessment orders. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>