https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459409 The proviso to Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 requires a promoter to make the prescribed pre-deposit before an appeal can be entertained. Objections that the underlying transaction was not a sale agreement, that the appellant was not a promoter, or that the compensation order was wrong or without jurisdiction go only to the merits and do not displace that statutory condition. On the stated analysis, the tribunal was justified in insisting on compliance with the pre-deposit requirement before proceeding with the appeal. en-us Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:59:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459409 The proviso to Section 43(5) of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 requires a promoter to make the prescribed pre-deposit before an appeal can be entertained. Objections that the underlying transaction was not a sale agreement, that the appellant was not a promoter, or that the compensation order was wrong or without jurisdiction go only to the merits and do not displace that statutory condition. On the stated analysis, the tribunal was justified in insisting on compliance with the pre-deposit requirement before proceeding with the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459409