<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Rulings: ESI/PF Disallowance Upheld, Sundry Creditors Claim Dismissed, IP Rights Depreciation Error Noted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83921</link>
    <description>Regarding the disallowance of late deposit of ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va), following the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Checkmate Services, the ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s ground and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition. Concerning the disallowance on account of sundry creditors, the assessee had written off the credit balances during the subsequent year, and reversing the addition would amount to double taxation; hence, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s ground. Pertaining to the disallowance of depreciation at 25% on the opening WDV of intellectual property rights, the ITAT held that the merger effectively took place in FY 2013-14, and the assets, including the patented technology&#039;s value accepted by the High Court, merged with the assessee company. T.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:57 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Rulings: ESI/PF Disallowance Upheld, Sundry Creditors Claim Dismissed, IP Rights Depreciation Error Noted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83921</link>
      <description>Regarding the disallowance of late deposit of ESI/PF u/s 36(1)(va), following the Supreme Court&#039;s ratio in Checkmate Services, the ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s ground and upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s addition. Concerning the disallowance on account of sundry creditors, the assessee had written off the credit balances during the subsequent year, and reversing the addition would amount to double taxation; hence, the ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s ground. Pertaining to the disallowance of depreciation at 25% on the opening WDV of intellectual property rights, the ITAT held that the merger effectively took place in FY 2013-14, and the assets, including the patented technology&#039;s value accepted by the High Court, merged with the assessee company. T.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:57 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>