<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 597 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763017</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application, rectifying the order dated 08.02.2024. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay interest on the Cenvat credit amount due to the time-barred nature of the demand. Consequently, the demand for interest was set aside, and the penalty was annulled. The decision was pronounced on 10.12.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 597 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763017</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the ROM application, rectifying the order dated 08.02.2024. It held that the appellant was not liable to pay interest on the Cenvat credit amount due to the time-barred nature of the demand. Consequently, the demand for interest was set aside, and the penalty was annulled. The decision was pronounced on 10.12.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763017</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>