<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 604 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763024</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands for Service Tax on both commission received and export sales commission &amp; advertisement expenses paid. It concluded that the demands were time-barred due to revenue neutrality and lack of malafide intent. The extended period for raising the demand was deemed inapplicable, emphasizing the necessity of clear tax evasion intent and proper documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 604 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763024</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demands for Service Tax on both commission received and export sales commission &amp; advertisement expenses paid. It concluded that the demands were time-barred due to revenue neutrality and lack of malafide intent. The extended period for raising the demand was deemed inapplicable, emphasizing the necessity of clear tax evasion intent and proper documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>