<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763031</link>
    <description>Prolonged incarceration in a PMLA matter, combined with the absence of charge-sheet progress in the predicate offence, was treated as sufficient to relax the statute&#039;s bail rigour where Article 21 and the right to speedy trial would otherwise be undermined. The Court noted that the accused was already on bail in the predicate offence, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no flight risk was shown, so release on bail was directed on conditions. It also held that counsel in a pending contested matter should not communicate directly by email with the investigating officer outside court proceedings, and that any grievance should be raised before the Court through proper professional channels.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 611 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763031</link>
      <description>Prolonged incarceration in a PMLA matter, combined with the absence of charge-sheet progress in the predicate offence, was treated as sufficient to relax the statute&#039;s bail rigour where Article 21 and the right to speedy trial would otherwise be undermined. The Court noted that the accused was already on bail in the predicate offence, custodial interrogation was unnecessary, and no flight risk was shown, so release on bail was directed on conditions. It also held that counsel in a pending contested matter should not communicate directly by email with the investigating officer outside court proceedings, and that any grievance should be raised before the Court through proper professional channels.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>