<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 614 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763034</link>
    <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order directing lenders to implement Resolution Plan by releasing Non-Fund Based facilities. Tribunal held that except one bank, no lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, and company had not defaulted on any existing facilities. NCLAT emphasized that approved Resolution Plans are binding on all stakeholders and must be implemented. The court rejected arguments that extended implementation timeline made the plan unviable, noting that preventing company from obtaining necessary bank guarantees would impede normal business operations and revenue generation, ultimately affecting repayment obligations contrary to Resolution Plan objectives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 614 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763034</link>
      <description>NCLAT Principal Bench dismissed appeals challenging Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order directing lenders to implement Resolution Plan by releasing Non-Fund Based facilities. Tribunal held that except one bank, no lender had issued bank guarantees or letters of credit, and company had not defaulted on any existing facilities. NCLAT emphasized that approved Resolution Plans are binding on all stakeholders and must be implemented. The court rejected arguments that extended implementation timeline made the plan unviable, noting that preventing company from obtaining necessary bank guarantees would impede normal business operations and revenue generation, ultimately affecting repayment obligations contrary to Resolution Plan objectives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>