<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 628 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763048</link>
    <description>CUP was preferred for benchmarking the assessee&#039;s international transactions because it had been consistently applied in earlier and later years, and no material change in facts justified switching to TNMM. The discussion notes that bona fide quotations may support CUP where they are reliable and comparable, and that an arm&#039;s length price need not depend only on an actually executed uncontrolled transaction. Jai Hind Projects Ltd. was treated as functionally dissimilar, given its large infrastructure and pipeline projects compared with the assessee&#039;s design and construction work, so it was not a proper comparable and had to be excluded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 628 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763048</link>
      <description>CUP was preferred for benchmarking the assessee&#039;s international transactions because it had been consistently applied in earlier and later years, and no material change in facts justified switching to TNMM. The discussion notes that bona fide quotations may support CUP where they are reliable and comparable, and that an arm&#039;s length price need not depend only on an actually executed uncontrolled transaction. Jai Hind Projects Ltd. was treated as functionally dissimilar, given its large infrastructure and pipeline projects compared with the assessee&#039;s design and construction work, so it was not a proper comparable and had to be excluded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>