<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763050</link>
    <description>Late filing fee under section 234E was stated to be inapplicable where the assessee had already filed the TDS statement within time and produced an undisputed acknowledgment of that filing. A later re-filing made only because the earlier statement was not reflected on the department&#039;s portal due to a technical glitch, and to facilitate issuance of TDS certificates, could not be treated as the relevant default. On that basis, the levy was deleted and the impugned demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 630 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763050</link>
      <description>Late filing fee under section 234E was stated to be inapplicable where the assessee had already filed the TDS statement within time and produced an undisputed acknowledgment of that filing. A later re-filing made only because the earlier statement was not reflected on the department&#039;s portal due to a technical glitch, and to facilitate issuance of TDS certificates, could not be treated as the relevant default. On that basis, the levy was deleted and the impugned demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>