<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763057</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi disposed of the appeal ex-parte after the assessee failed to appear despite notices. The tribunal classified this as a classic penny stock transaction case involving bogus LTCG. Finding that CIT(A) had passed a well-reasoned order addressing all assessee arguments, ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and rejected all grounds raised by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed upholding the lower authority&#039;s findings on the penny stock transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 637 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763057</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi disposed of the appeal ex-parte after the assessee failed to appear despite notices. The tribunal classified this as a classic penny stock transaction case involving bogus LTCG. Finding that CIT(A) had passed a well-reasoned order addressing all assessee arguments, ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision and rejected all grounds raised by the assessee. The appeal was dismissed upholding the lower authority&#039;s findings on the penny stock transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>