<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 16 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39674</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner failed to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The petition was dismissed, the rule discharged, and no costs were awarded, with the stay order vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 16:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 16 - GAUHATI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39674</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction to issue the notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner failed to disclose all material facts necessary for assessment. The petition was dismissed, the rule discharged, and no costs were awarded, with the stay order vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>