<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763069</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice issued under Section 148 was time-barred as it exceeded the limitation period prescribed under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s contention that the notice was within time due to the non-obstante clause under Section 150 was rejected. The court clarified that the HC&#039;s earlier decision dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal could not be construed as containing findings and directions permitting reopening assessments beyond the statutory time limit. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on the Abhisar Buildwell SC decision was misplaced, as it did not permit reopening assessments beyond prescribed periods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 649 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763069</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC held that a notice issued under Section 148 was time-barred as it exceeded the limitation period prescribed under Section 149(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Revenue&#039;s contention that the notice was within time due to the non-obstante clause under Section 150 was rejected. The court clarified that the HC&#039;s earlier decision dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal could not be construed as containing findings and directions permitting reopening assessments beyond the statutory time limit. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on the Abhisar Buildwell SC decision was misplaced, as it did not permit reopening assessments beyond prescribed periods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>