<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 652 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763072</link>
    <description>Delhi HC quashed reassessment notice under Section 148, holding that formation of opinion under Section 147 cannot be of changing nature. Court found that since petitioner did not directly receive remittances from DSNE CGHS, there was no obligation to disclose in return of income. Reassessment requires failure to make full and true disclosure of material facts. Writ petition allowed, notice quashed, but respondents permitted to initiate fresh proceedings if legally permissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 08:55:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 652 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763072</link>
      <description>Delhi HC quashed reassessment notice under Section 148, holding that formation of opinion under Section 147 cannot be of changing nature. Court found that since petitioner did not directly receive remittances from DSNE CGHS, there was no obligation to disclose in return of income. Reassessment requires failure to make full and true disclosure of material facts. Writ petition allowed, notice quashed, but respondents permitted to initiate fresh proceedings if legally permissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>