https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763077 Anticipatory bail was not cancelled where allegations of misuse of login credentials, diversion of funds, false returns and online manipulation of records did not disclose offences treated as heinous enough to justify cancellation. The court noted that investigation had already advanced, online tampering could be traced through records, and the accused were adequately secured for trial by conditions such as travel restrictions and surrender of passport. The proceeding was also distinguished from a recovery action. On that basis, cancellation under Sections 439(2) and 482 CrPC was held unwarranted and the petitions were rejected. en-us Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Jul 2025 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763077 Anticipatory bail was not cancelled where allegations of misuse of login credentials, diversion of funds, false returns and online manipulation of records did not disclose offences treated as heinous enough to justify cancellation. The court noted that investigation had already advanced, online tampering could be traced through records, and the accused were adequately secured for trial by conditions such as travel restrictions and surrender of passport. The proceeding was also distinguished from a recovery action. On that basis, cancellation under Sections 439(2) and 482 CrPC was held unwarranted and the petitions were rejected. Case-Laws GST Wed, 04 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763077