<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 658 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763078</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging an Order-in-Original from January 2023. The court emphasized exhausting alternate remedies, noted significant delay in filing, and highlighted vagueness in prayer clauses. The petitioner failed to provide compelling reasons for bypassing appellate procedures, and the court found the allegations insufficiently substantive to warrant judicial intervention.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 658 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763078</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the petition challenging an Order-in-Original from January 2023. The court emphasized exhausting alternate remedies, noted significant delay in filing, and highlighted vagueness in prayer clauses. The petitioner failed to provide compelling reasons for bypassing appellate procedures, and the court found the allegations insufficiently substantive to warrant judicial intervention.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763078</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>