<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (4) TMI 1322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459403</link>
    <description>The Madras HC allowed a petition by company shareholders seeking investigation into the company&#039;s affairs under Section 237 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the company failed to comply with listing agreements, suspended equity share trading remained unrevoked, and shareholders were kept uninformed about major activities including amalgamation and de-listing. Despite claiming notices were sent, the company provided no evidence of delivery. The company&#039;s failure to furnish required information for over five years, citing bulky records as excuse, was deemed unacceptable. The HC directed the Central Government to appoint inspectors to investigate the company&#039;s affairs and submit a report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (4) TMI 1322 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459403</link>
      <description>The Madras HC allowed a petition by company shareholders seeking investigation into the company&#039;s affairs under Section 237 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Court found that the company failed to comply with listing agreements, suspended equity share trading remained unrevoked, and shareholders were kept uninformed about major activities including amalgamation and de-listing. Despite claiming notices were sent, the company provided no evidence of delivery. The company&#039;s failure to furnish required information for over five years, citing bulky records as excuse, was deemed unacceptable. The HC directed the Central Government to appoint inspectors to investigate the company&#039;s affairs and submit a report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>