<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (8) TMI 1498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459405</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Ld. PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, which had directed the AO to examine commission expenses related to LTCG disallowance. The Tribunal found the jurisdiction assumption unsustainable, as the main issue was pending before the CIT(A). The decision was pronounced on 26.08.2024.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 19:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (8) TMI 1498 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459405</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, setting aside the Ld. PCIT&#039;s order under section 263 of the Income Tax Act, which had directed the AO to examine commission expenses related to LTCG disallowance. The Tribunal found the jurisdiction assumption unsustainable, as the main issue was pending before the CIT(A). The decision was pronounced on 26.08.2024.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>