https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459380 A settled appointment could not be annulled after an inordinate delay where the Chancellor had earlier directed appointment and the University had subsequently approved it post facto. The Court held that, even if a statutory or supervisory power of review or revision exists without a prescribed limitation, it must be exercised within a reasonable time; a challenge revived after more than eight years on the same grounds was impermissibly stale. The termination of the Assistant Registrar's service was therefore unsustainable and was quashed, with consequential service benefits directed to follow. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 18:57:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459380 A settled appointment could not be annulled after an inordinate delay where the Chancellor had earlier directed appointment and the University had subsequently approved it post facto. The Court held that, even if a statutory or supervisory power of review or revision exists without a prescribed limitation, it must be exercised within a reasonable time; a challenge revived after more than eight years on the same grounds was impermissibly stale. The termination of the Assistant Registrar's service was therefore unsustainable and was quashed, with consequential service benefits directed to follow. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 13 Oct 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459380