<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (1) TMI 1400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459392</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee, confirming that associated enterprises can be selected as tested parties for TP adjustments. The Court relied on prior rulings affirming the assessee&#039;s position across multiple assessment years and accepted that Indian TP guidelines and OECD standards do not prohibit associated enterprises from being tested parties. The Tribunal&#039;s findings on the functional, asset, and risk profiles were deemed legally valid. The decision was against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 15:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782151" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (1) TMI 1400 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459392</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee, confirming that associated enterprises can be selected as tested parties for TP adjustments. The Court relied on prior rulings affirming the assessee&#039;s position across multiple assessment years and accepted that Indian TP guidelines and OECD standards do not prohibit associated enterprises from being tested parties. The Tribunal&#039;s findings on the functional, asset, and risk profiles were deemed legally valid. The decision was against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459392</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>