https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459375 The HC determined the respondent company's defense was not bona fide or genuine, as disputes lacked evidentiary support. The court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 30,00,000 with the court registry by 3.9.2013 to demonstrate bona fides. Failure to comply would result in petition admission and appointment of a Provisional Liquidator. The case was adjourned to 4.9.2013 for further proceedings. en-us Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 16:04:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459375 The HC determined the respondent company's defense was not bona fide or genuine, as disputes lacked evidentiary support. The court ordered the respondent to deposit Rs. 30,00,000 with the court registry by 3.9.2013 to demonstrate bona fides. Failure to comply would result in petition admission and appointment of a Provisional Liquidator. The case was adjourned to 4.9.2013 for further proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 05 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459375