<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1974 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39658</link>
    <description>A rectification notice issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held not properly issued for an assessment completed before 1 April 1962, but it was nevertheless sustainable in substance as a notice under section 35 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The text also states that rectification under section 35(5) could operate where the firm&#039;s assessment was completed under the 1961 Act, because the rectification machinery follows the statutory setting governing the firm&#039;s assessment. On that basis, the challenge to the partner&#039;s assessment based on the firm&#039;s later assessment failed, and the impugned demand and consequential steps were left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 15:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=78204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1974 (3) TMI 15 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39658</link>
      <description>A rectification notice issued under the Income-tax Act, 1961 was held not properly issued for an assessment completed before 1 April 1962, but it was nevertheless sustainable in substance as a notice under section 35 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922. The text also states that rectification under section 35(5) could operate where the firm&#039;s assessment was completed under the 1961 Act, because the rectification machinery follows the statutory setting governing the firm&#039;s assessment. On that basis, the challenge to the partner&#039;s assessment based on the firm&#039;s later assessment failed, and the impugned demand and consequential steps were left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 1974 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=39658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>