<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 763 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459372</link>
    <description>The SC upheld the State and National Commissions&#039; decisions, directing the appellant to pay the respondent 75% of the sum insured on a non-standard basis. The Court ruled that in vehicle theft cases, the nature of use at the time of theft is irrelevant, and the insurer must indemnify the owner under the comprehensive policy. The appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 10:40:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=782005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 763 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459372</link>
      <description>The SC upheld the State and National Commissions&#039; decisions, directing the appellant to pay the respondent 75% of the sum insured on a non-standard basis. The Court ruled that in vehicle theft cases, the nature of use at the time of theft is irrelevant, and the insurer must indemnify the owner under the comprehensive policy. The appeal was dismissed, with each party bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>