<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>DRI had jurisdiction to issue show cause notice under Customs Act, as per Supreme Court ruling. Case restored for adjudication.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83868</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the respondent (DRI) had jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice under the Customs Act, 1962, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. The petition was disposed of by restoring the notice to the Adjudicating Authority for adjudication by a proper officer u/s 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>DRI had jurisdiction to issue show cause notice under Customs Act, as per Supreme Court ruling. Case restored for adjudication.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83868</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the respondent (DRI) had jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice under the Customs Act, 1962, following the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Commissioner of Customs vs. Canon India Pvt. Ltd. The petition was disposed of by restoring the notice to the Adjudicating Authority for adjudication by a proper officer u/s 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=83868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>