https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762944 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after rejecting a request for adjournment. The tribunal cited SC precedent condemning mechanical adjournment practices, emphasizing courts should be slow in granting adjournments and not allow repeated adjournments routinely. The tribunal noted the maximum statutory limit of three adjournments had been reached, with no justification for further delay. The decision reinforced the need to abandon adjournment culture to maintain confidence in the justice delivery system and uphold rule of law. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2024 20:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762944 CESTAT Allahabad dismissed an appeal for non-prosecution under Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982, after rejecting a request for adjournment. The tribunal cited SC precedent condemning mechanical adjournment practices, emphasizing courts should be slow in granting adjournments and not allow repeated adjournments routinely. The tribunal noted the maximum statutory limit of three adjournments had been reached, with no justification for further delay. The decision reinforced the need to abandon adjournment culture to maintain confidence in the justice delivery system and uphold rule of law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762944