<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 527 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762947</link>
    <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside multiple demands totaling approximately Rs. 2.76 crores against the appellant. The tribunal held that undervaluation demands for stock transfers and sales to sister units were not sustainable due to revenue neutrality, as duty paid by appellant was available as CENVAT credit to receiving units. Transit loss allowances were permitted for methanol shortages. CENVAT credit denial for R&amp;amp;D inputs was reversed, recognizing research activities as part of manufacturing. Credits based on endorsed invoices/bills of entry were allowed following HC precedent. Stock shortage allegations were rejected due to improper verification methods and lack of corroborative evidence. All penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 16:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781953" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 527 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762947</link>
      <description>CESTAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, setting aside multiple demands totaling approximately Rs. 2.76 crores against the appellant. The tribunal held that undervaluation demands for stock transfers and sales to sister units were not sustainable due to revenue neutrality, as duty paid by appellant was available as CENVAT credit to receiving units. Transit loss allowances were permitted for methanol shortages. CENVAT credit denial for R&amp;amp;D inputs was reversed, recognizing research activities as part of manufacturing. Credits based on endorsed invoices/bills of entry were allowed following HC precedent. Stock shortage allegations were rejected due to improper verification methods and lack of corroborative evidence. All penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762947</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>