https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762958 A writ challenge to a show cause notice was held ordinarily premature where an efficacious statutory remedy existed and no exceptional jurisdictional error or natural justice breach was shown. The Court also rejected quashing on delay and laches, noting that mere passage of time was insufficient where the objection could be raised before the authority. Objections based on review, revisit, double jeopardy and res judicata were not accepted at the notice stage because they required factual comparison not possible on the record. Non-furnishing of some material did not justify quashing, though limited disclosure and additional time to reply were directed. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762958 A writ challenge to a show cause notice was held ordinarily premature where an efficacious statutory remedy existed and no exceptional jurisdictional error or natural justice breach was shown. The Court also rejected quashing on delay and laches, noting that mere passage of time was insufficient where the objection could be raised before the authority. Objections based on review, revisit, double jeopardy and res judicata were not accepted at the notice stage because they required factual comparison not possible on the record. Non-furnishing of some material did not justify quashing, though limited disclosure and additional time to reply were directed. Case-Laws SEBI Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762958