https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762964 Delhi HC ruled that mid-year review of TRQ allocations conducted without proper hearing or notice to petitioners was procedurally flawed. The court found merit in petitioners' contentions that the review lacked specified criteria and constituted a "blind review." While acknowledging respondents' objective to ensure TRQ imports under India-UAE CEPA are fully met, the court directed DGFT to examine all issues raised and issue fresh decision within three weeks. Current allocations must be maintained until review completion. No re-allocations had been made pursuant to impugned meeting minutes. Petitions disposed of. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 14:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762964 Delhi HC ruled that mid-year review of TRQ allocations conducted without proper hearing or notice to petitioners was procedurally flawed. The court found merit in petitioners' contentions that the review lacked specified criteria and constituted a "blind review." While acknowledging respondents' objective to ensure TRQ imports under India-UAE CEPA are fully met, the court directed DGFT to examine all issues raised and issue fresh decision within three weeks. Current allocations must be maintained until review completion. No re-allocations had been made pursuant to impugned meeting minutes. Petitions disposed of. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762964