https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762984 Gujarat HC allowed taxpayer's appeal against Tribunal's refusal to condone 2208-day delay in filing appeal. Court found Tribunal's order perverse for recording incorrect facts regarding delivery of CIT(A) order, noting department cannot be blamed when order was delivered to address mentioned in Form No. 35. HC quashed Tribunal's order, condoned the delay, and remanded matter back to Tribunal for decision on merits, ruling in favor of assessee against Revenue. en-us Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Apr 2026 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762984 Gujarat HC allowed taxpayer's appeal against Tribunal's refusal to condone 2208-day delay in filing appeal. Court found Tribunal's order perverse for recording incorrect facts regarding delivery of CIT(A) order, noting department cannot be blamed when order was delivered to address mentioned in Form No. 35. HC quashed Tribunal's order, condoned the delay, and remanded matter back to Tribunal for decision on merits, ruling in favor of assessee against Revenue. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 19 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762984