<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 571 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762991</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was declined because an alternate statutory appeal was available, and the court held that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked in preference to that remedy. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the order was non-speaking was not accepted as a ground to bypass the appellate mechanism. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 21:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 571 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762991</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a GST adjudication order was declined because an alternate statutory appeal was available, and the court held that writ jurisdiction should not be invoked in preference to that remedy. The petitioner&#039;s argument that the order was non-speaking was not accepted as a ground to bypass the appellate mechanism. The petitioner was left to pursue the statutory appeal, with liberty to file it within the stated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>