https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763004 The HC allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the penalty orders imposed under Section 129(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, due to flawed reasoning regarding ownership. The court recognized the petitioner as the owner based on official records, remanding the matter for a fresh order under Section 129(1)(a) within two weeks. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:15:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763004 The HC allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the penalty orders imposed under Section 129(1)(b) of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act, 2017, due to flawed reasoning regarding ownership. The court recognized the petitioner as the owner based on official records, remanding the matter for a fresh order under Section 129(1)(a) within two weeks. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763004