<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (12) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763010</link>
    <description>The petitioner requested direction for GST payment at 18% rate instead of 12%. The court granted respondents time to make the differential payment. Upon confirmation that the GST difference amount was paid to petitioner, the petition was disposed of accordingly. The matter was resolved through payment of the outstanding GST differential amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2025 14:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (12) TMI 590 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763010</link>
      <description>The petitioner requested direction for GST payment at 18% rate instead of 12%. The court granted respondents time to make the differential payment. Upon confirmation that the GST difference amount was paid to petitioner, the petition was disposed of accordingly. The matter was resolved through payment of the outstanding GST differential amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>