https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763011 A writ challenge to assessment orders was declined because the petitioner had not exhausted the statutory appellate remedy. Allegations of natural justice breach, non-consideration of precedent, or double demand on amounts already paid were treated as matters requiring factual and merits-based examination by the appellate forum, not grounds to bypass appeal. The Court also noted the absence of a timely rectification application. At the same time, liberty was granted to file appeals within four weeks, and any appeal filed within that period was to be decided on merits without objection on limitation; a rectification application remained open if otherwise maintainable. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Jul 2025 15:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763011 A writ challenge to assessment orders was declined because the petitioner had not exhausted the statutory appellate remedy. Allegations of natural justice breach, non-consideration of precedent, or double demand on amounts already paid were treated as matters requiring factual and merits-based examination by the appellate forum, not grounds to bypass appeal. The Court also noted the absence of a timely rectification application. At the same time, liberty was granted to file appeals within four weeks, and any appeal filed within that period was to be decided on merits without objection on limitation; a rectification application remained open if otherwise maintainable. Case-Laws GST Mon, 09 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=763011