https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459347 Gujarat HC dismissed petition challenging denial of advocate enrollment. Petitioner worked with GIDC under contract requiring regular office attendance (11 AM-5 PM), fixed monthly salary of Rs. 25,000, and security deposit. Court held this constituted full-time employment violating Bar Council of India Rule 49. Expert committee headed by retired HC judge recommended rejection after reviewing facts. Court found no error in Bar Council's decision denying enrollment and certificate of practice. Petitioner also denied participation in Civil Judge recruitment as she was not allied department employee per advertisement requirements. en-us Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459347 Gujarat HC dismissed petition challenging denial of advocate enrollment. Petitioner worked with GIDC under contract requiring regular office attendance (11 AM-5 PM), fixed monthly salary of Rs. 25,000, and security deposit. Court held this constituted full-time employment violating Bar Council of India Rule 49. Expert committee headed by retired HC judge recommended rejection after reviewing facts. Court found no error in Bar Council's decision denying enrollment and certificate of practice. Petitioner also denied participation in Civil Judge recruitment as she was not allied department employee per advertisement requirements. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 21 Jun 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459347