<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1472 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459348</link>
    <description>Where export proceeds are traceably received from a third party, the bank may not refuse to credit the exporter&#039;s account or withhold credit confirmation and the Bank Remission Certificate merely because the remitter is not the overseas buyer. The later RBI circular relaxed the earlier tripartite-agreement requirement if documentary evidence explains the third-party payment and the authorised dealer is satisfied about the bona fides of the transaction and export documents. Here, the shipping documents, SWIFT message and buyer&#039;s clarification linked the remittance to the export invoice, so the refusal was unwarranted and the petitioner was entitled to regularisation of the remittance and issuance of the requisite certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1472 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459348</link>
      <description>Where export proceeds are traceably received from a third party, the bank may not refuse to credit the exporter&#039;s account or withhold credit confirmation and the Bank Remission Certificate merely because the remitter is not the overseas buyer. The later RBI circular relaxed the earlier tripartite-agreement requirement if documentary evidence explains the third-party payment and the authorised dealer is satisfied about the bona fides of the transaction and export documents. Here, the shipping documents, SWIFT message and buyer&#039;s clarification linked the remittance to the export invoice, so the refusal was unwarranted and the petitioner was entitled to regularisation of the remittance and issuance of the requisite certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>