https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350 Bombay HC quashed the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council's rejection of petitioner's application on grounds that medium enterprises cannot invoke section 18 jurisdiction under MSMED Act, 2006. Court held that sections 2(n)(iii), 17 and 18 must be read harmoniously, and enterprises other than micro/small can access section 18 forum if they are suppliers of goods produced by or services provided by micro/small enterprises. Council failed to consider statutory definition of "supplier" and misdirected itself. Matter remanded for fresh consideration based on whether petitioner qualifies as supplier under the Act. en-us Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350 Bombay HC quashed the Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council's rejection of petitioner's application on grounds that medium enterprises cannot invoke section 18 jurisdiction under MSMED Act, 2006. Court held that sections 2(n)(iii), 17 and 18 must be read harmoniously, and enterprises other than micro/small can access section 18 forum if they are suppliers of goods produced by or services provided by micro/small enterprises. Council failed to consider statutory definition of "supplier" and misdirected itself. Matter remanded for fresh consideration based on whether petitioner qualifies as supplier under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350