<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1560 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350</link>
    <description>Section 2(n)(iii) of the MSME Development Act has an inclusive scope and can extend the status of &quot;supplier&quot; beyond micro or small enterprises to a company or body engaged in selling goods produced by, or rendering services provided by, such enterprises. Read with Sections 17 and 18, the statutory remedy before the Facilitation Council is therefore not automatically confined to micro or small enterprises alone. A medium enterprise may invoke Section 18 if it first satisfies the definition of supplier under Section 2(n)(iii). The Council erred in rejecting the claim solely on the ground that the petitioner was a medium enterprise, without first determining supplier status.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:00:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=781880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1560 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350</link>
      <description>Section 2(n)(iii) of the MSME Development Act has an inclusive scope and can extend the status of &quot;supplier&quot; beyond micro or small enterprises to a company or body engaged in selling goods produced by, or rendering services provided by, such enterprises. Read with Sections 17 and 18, the statutory remedy before the Facilitation Council is therefore not automatically confined to micro or small enterprises alone. A medium enterprise may invoke Section 18 if it first satisfies the definition of supplier under Section 2(n)(iii). The Council erred in rejecting the claim solely on the ground that the petitioner was a medium enterprise, without first determining supplier status.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=459350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>